On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:10 PM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:22 AM Sebastian Berg < >> sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote: >>> > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority >>> > labels >>> > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed >>> > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything >>> > "low" >>> > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly >>> > forgotten, >>> > and no "normal" tag is needed. >>> > >>> > >>> > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to >>> > use >>> > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on. >>> > >>> > Any objections or thoughts? >>> > >>> >>> Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags >>> right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have >>> only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very >>> occasionally). >>> >>> - Sebastian >>> >> >> +1 from me as well. I haven't been using these tags at all. >> > > +1 > > +1 I may have used one of the priority labels once or twice, I don't really remember. When I think something needs to be fixed or merged I generally add a benchmark. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
