On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:22 AM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote: > > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority > > labels > > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed > > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything > > "low" > > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly > > forgotten, > > and no "normal" tag is needed. > > > > > > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to > > use > > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on. > > > > Any objections or thoughts? > > > > Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags > right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have > only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very > occasionally). > > - Sebastian > +1 from me as well. I haven't been using these tags at all.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
