On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:22 AM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote: >> > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority >> > labels >> > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed >> > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything >> > "low" >> > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly >> > forgotten, >> > and no "normal" tag is needed. >> > >> > >> > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to >> > use >> > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on. >> > >> > Any objections or thoughts? >> > >> >> Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags >> right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have >> only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very >> occasionally). >> >> - Sebastian >> > > +1 from me as well. I haven't been using these tags at all. > +1 Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
