On 04/12/2012 11:51 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 04/12/2012 11:13 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> Dag, >> >> Thanks for the link to your CEP. This is the first time I've seen it. You >> probably referenced it before, but I hadn't seen it. >> >> That CEP seems along the lines of what I was thinking of. We can make >> scipy follow that CEP and NumPy as well in places that it needs function >> pointers. >> >> I can certainly get behind it with Numba and recommend it to SciPy (and >> write the scipy.integrate.quad function to support it). >> >> Thanks for the CEP. > > Great. I'll pass this message on to the Cython list and see if anybody > wants to provide input (but given the scope, it should be minor tweaks > and easy to accommodate in whatever code you write).
Getting back with a status update on this, the thread is still rolling and benchmarks getting taken on the Cython list. I think it will take some more time. This CEP will be incredibly important for Cython, e.g. if NumPy starts supporting it then from numpy import sin cdef double f(double x): return sin(x*x) won't be that much slower than early-binding directly with sin. It could take another couple of weeks. So for Numba I think just starting with whatever is fastest is the way to go now; and then hopefully one can have the CEP done and things ported over before a Numba or SciPy release gets into the wild without conforming to it. Dag _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion