On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]>wrote: > > I have a suggestion (really a phasing) which appears to match both main > camps' arguments: >
This is an interesting strategy that ensures the best for Grok camp and the community camp. I appreciate this point of view, but it isn't needed. Instead of finding a solution that satiates two camps. Lets blast the differentiating illusion apart. What unifies us is the creation of a technically superior software implementation of the neocortex that remains true to biology. Might I remind everyone on this list we are nupic-hackers, not Grok employees, nor husbands, wives etc, Here our concern is technical superior sw neocortex with a high degree of biomimicry. Not Grok, not Google's intelligent index thingy, nor George's pet project takes precedence. In here there is no hierarchy we listen to other than what nature dictates as revealed by our neuroscience comrades. Our aim is to deliver something that is efficient, clean and true biomimetically. Let's keep things simple. Fork, strip off abstractions, delicately remove core then make a decision upon a direction from there. Grok and other clients will wait at NuPIC till we (nupic-hackers as a united entity) determine a clean direction forward for nupic.core a direction that has regression tests, builds on all platforms, and is well commented and documented. We aren't doing anything dramatic, it's a house cleaning, a reorganization with slight renovations here and there. What we come up with will satisfy. It'll be a grand re-opening under the new owners (nupic-hackers) Grok and other guests in their lovely gowns will be seduced into living in our house. Kind regards Stewart P.S </propaganda>
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
