Hi,

I haven't read all messages up to now, so I can talk some nonsense.. but
Scott's vision is pretty similar than mine.

I believe Numenta enginers are right on their concerns regarding stability
and other issues as already exists workable products running from current
repository. And I dont see any need for "reinvent the wheel" according to
another post from Matt, because we just need a good and heavy
refactoring.But as Scott and Matt said, this is a  tricky job, we have
do this in a
delicate way.. so.. all we need be patiente... I would love work in a new
clean house. Because this, I've made or supported several contributions
related to CMake, repository structure, C++11, etc.

I'm pretty sure that when we have a clean house with a separated core, we
will can make better decisions, and contributions will be done according to
community members, i.e. some will contribute with core, others only in
grok, and so on...

Anyway, I'm suspected to give opinion, my friends from OpenHTM know I'm
addicted to clean and reorganize things (to better). :-)

Best, David


On 27 January 2014 06:22, stewart mackenzie <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>>
>> I have a suggestion (really a phasing) which appears to match both main
>> camps' arguments:
>>
>
>
> This is an interesting strategy that ensures the best for Grok camp and
> the community camp.
> I appreciate this point of view, but it isn't needed.
>
> Instead of finding a solution that satiates two camps. Lets blast the
> differentiating illusion apart.
> What unifies us is the creation of a technically superior software
> implementation of the neocortex that remains true to biology.
>
> Might I remind everyone on this list we are nupic-hackers, not Grok
> employees, nor husbands, wives etc,
> Here our concern is technical superior sw neocortex with a high degree of
> biomimicry.
> Not Grok, not Google's intelligent index thingy, nor George's pet project
> takes precedence.
> In here there is no hierarchy we listen to other than what nature dictates
> as revealed by our neuroscience comrades.
>
> Our aim is to deliver something that is efficient, clean and true
> biomimetically.
>
> Let's keep things simple. Fork, strip off abstractions, delicately remove
> core then make a decision upon a direction from there.
> Grok and other clients will wait at NuPIC till we (nupic-hackers as a
> united entity) determine a clean direction forward for nupic.core
> a direction that has regression tests, builds on all platforms, and is
> well commented and documented.
> We aren't doing anything dramatic, it's a house cleaning, a reorganization
> with slight renovations here and there.
>
> What we come up with will satisfy.
> It'll be a grand re-opening under the new owners (nupic-hackers)
> Grok and other guests in their lovely gowns will be seduced into living in
> our house.
>
> Kind regards
> Stewart
>
>
> P.S </propaganda>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to