Thanks everyone for your input. Further discussion and planning for the
extraction is continuing on the nupic-hackers list
(*http://lists.numenta.org/pipermail/nupic-hackers_lists.numenta.org/2014-January/000169.html
<http://lists.numenta.org/pipermail/nupic-hackers_lists.numenta.org/2014-January/000169.html>*).
Please subscribe to nupic-hackers here if interested in the implementation
of this work:

http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic-hackers_lists.numenta.org

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, David Ragazzi <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I haven't read all messages up to now, so I can talk some nonsense.. but
> Scott's vision is pretty similar than mine.
>
> I believe Numenta enginers are right on their concerns regarding stability
> and other issues as already exists workable products running from current
> repository. And I dont see any need for "reinvent the wheel" according to
> another post from Matt, because we just need a good and heavy refactoring.But 
> as Scott and Matt said, this is a  tricky job, we have do this in a
> delicate way.. so.. all we need be patiente... I would love work in a new
> clean house. Because this, I've made or supported several contributions
> related to CMake, repository structure, C++11, etc.
>
> I'm pretty sure that when we have a clean house with a separated core, we
> will can make better decisions, and contributions will be done according to
> community members, i.e. some will contribute with core, others only in
> grok, and so on...
>
> Anyway, I'm suspected to give opinion, my friends from OpenHTM know I'm
> addicted to clean and reorganize things (to better). :-)
>
> Best, David
>
>
> On 27 January 2014 06:22, stewart mackenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Fergal Byrne <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a suggestion (really a phasing) which appears to match both main
>>> camps' arguments:
>>>
>>
>>
>> This is an interesting strategy that ensures the best for Grok camp and
>> the community camp.
>> I appreciate this point of view, but it isn't needed.
>>
>> Instead of finding a solution that satiates two camps. Lets blast the
>> differentiating illusion apart.
>> What unifies us is the creation of a technically superior software
>> implementation of the neocortex that remains true to biology.
>>
>> Might I remind everyone on this list we are nupic-hackers, not Grok
>> employees, nor husbands, wives etc,
>> Here our concern is technical superior sw neocortex with a high degree of
>> biomimicry.
>> Not Grok, not Google's intelligent index thingy, nor George's pet project
>> takes precedence.
>> In here there is no hierarchy we listen to other than what nature
>> dictates as revealed by our neuroscience comrades.
>>
>> Our aim is to deliver something that is efficient, clean and true
>> biomimetically.
>>
>> Let's keep things simple. Fork, strip off abstractions, delicately remove
>> core then make a decision upon a direction from there.
>> Grok and other clients will wait at NuPIC till we (nupic-hackers as a
>> united entity) determine a clean direction forward for nupic.core
>> a direction that has regression tests, builds on all platforms, and is
>> well commented and documented.
>> We aren't doing anything dramatic, it's a house cleaning, a
>> reorganization with slight renovations here and there.
>>
>> What we come up with will satisfy.
>> It'll be a grand re-opening under the new owners (nupic-hackers)
>> Grok and other guests in their lovely gowns will be seduced into living
>> in our house.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Stewart
>>
>>
>> P.S </propaganda>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to