I sometimes get replies that are directed only to me. Oftentimes it is a sender "error" to not have used Reply to All, so I direct my response back to the list. Rarely it is about something the senders deem confidential, where a pointed reply seems to make sense (overriding would be bad).
Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes "as is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really inclined to - let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for each case :) Jim On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 9:32 AM Roger Price via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > I recently wrote to the list. The distributed message had the following > headers: > > > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:22:59 +0100 (CET) > > From: Roger Price via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net> > > Reply-To: Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> > > To: nut-upsuser Mailing List <nut-upsu...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > Subject: ... > > Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list. > Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic on > the > list", rather than wandering off into private discussions. The > nut-upsuser > setup has exactly the opposite effect. > > Is it the intention to send the subscibers into private conversation? If > not, > and I suspect not, then the current Reply-To looks like a bug. > > Any replies to the list please. Roger > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
