And here are just a few of the "negligent" organizations according to Looi.......
U.S. Army Lower Valley Wireless Public Safety Network Glendale, California Baltimore, Maryland, Police Department Lawrence, Kansas, Police Department Toronto Police Service and the list goes on. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > see below: > > Mike Kershaw wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this isn't new. > > I did not think it was since almost 2 years ago PSWN (and others) > http://www.pswn.gov/admin/librarydocs11/Wireless_data_networking_standards_802_11.pdf > ) > identified this weakness in addition to a slew of others to 1st > responders who contemplated > using un-protected spectrum for "Mission Critical" applications. > > Looi's message just reiterates what we in wireless have know for > years.................. > > >"Any organization that continues to use the standard wireless > technology, 802.11b, to operate > > critical infrastructure could be considered negligent." > > Sometimes it takes a red flag in the main stream media from the leaders > of the academic establishment before the message it hits > home in the public safety community. -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/