There is no such thing as protected spectrum if we're talking about
public safety in the US.  If you are willing to break the social
contract you can transmit on any frequency any time with as many
transmitters as you can afford. And you don't have to colocate near the
transmitter and so get caught.  If a government wants to protect a
swath of spectrum for some use it needs to get buyin from the masses, a
good way to do that is to get every single person to vote and to ensure
they trust the counting of those votes.  This government also wants to
avoid angry foreigners, so it needs to avoid foreign entanglements and
so not trade with despots or governments that exclude a portion of
their populace from voting, and avoid direct involvement in any wars.
It also helps to be a smallish country and not have any former or
current colonies (Phillipines, Guam, Cuba, Haiti, Puerto Rico).
This way there is no interest in using the spectrum aside from greed
which you can combat with large fines.

If you want safe effective communications without buy-in, use wires,
preferrably a mesh.

Thankfully, there is a scale here. Less evil = less problems = less
cost, firefighters can be more trusting of the public than the police,
and the police can be more trusting of the public than the army.

-- Daniel

On Mon, 24 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

]True, Don't forget about attacking the air interface (OFMD) wave form.
]There are now software defined radios that can cause havoc without going to
]the IP layer. 2.4 Ghz saturation is not far away there will be no need to
]worry about an attack the noise floor will never let you link up.. The fear
]is using part 15 (Toys) for serious applications.
]
]Remember the Part15 Moto...........
]
]"Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may
]not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any
]interference received, including interference that may cause undesired
]operation."
]
]
]There is a "Fix"  it's called protected spectrum. Mess with it and you will
]have the wrath of someone similar to the "Hammer" kicking in your front
]door.....
]
]And yes the FCC (With the help of the US Marshals) still do it.......
]
]Bottom line is every needs to understand 802.11 is not the wireless panacea
]as the media has hyped the general public to believe.
]
]The overall threat level with a PDA is moderate at best.
]
]Jon Baer wrote:
]
]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
]> >
]> > Looi's message just reiterates what we in wireless have know for
]> > years..................
]> >
]>
]> The big difference is that we can tell the difference between things
]> like CSMA/CA, RTS/CTS, DCF, PCF, EDCF, NAVs, CF-ACKS, etc ... to some
]> implementing it or just buying for the home its alphabet soup.  I dunno
]> is the bigger fear that more cheaper legacy gear in the wild will = more
]> problems?  Im also skeptical (from what ive seen playing w/
]> airjack/void11) that a low powered PDA carrier sense attack will cause
]> any widespread panic.  It should just be left @ "if I wanted to knock
]> you off the network, i can with multiple techniques" but stop short of
]> anything that reinit'ing your card can simply fix.
]>
]> Jon
]> --
]> NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
]> Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
]> Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
]
]--
]    "NEXTEL-1 IT'S NOT JUST NEXTEL"
]  Note The New address
]Subscribe to Nextel-1: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL-1
]
]  "NEXTEL2 FOR iDEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS"
]Subscribe to Nextel2: http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/NEXTEL2
]
]  "WIRELESS FORUM HOMELAND SECURITY GROUP"
]     The Complete Resource for Wireless Homeland Security.
]Subscribe to WFHSG:  http://www.groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/WFHSG
]
]
]--
]NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
]Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
]Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
]
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to