On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 18:24 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Um > > a) Our space in 55 broad is not subsidized. We are paying the full > market > rate.
That WHOLE BUILDING is currently subsidized otherwise your "Market" rate would be much higher, something I'm sure you noticed when shopping for a space. > > b) We are providing services to other tenants of 55 Broad via > in-building > fiber that we fully pay for. No Verizon. > Who gives a rat about this. Your in the business of providing ASDL to homes, and that uses Verizon. Your PTP connection to Queens uses Verizon lines for that matter (unless 55 Broad has suddenly grown to Twin Tower size). So how does what your saying have anything to do with the current discussion, or the side discussion of your dependence on Verizon for your business. All those clients now use you as a common carrier. They already have legal rights and protections. The Network Neutrality bills floating around, proposed by those communists at Google, are intended to just strengthen those rights and prevetn someone like you using their common carrier status to interfere with public commerce. Ruben DRM is Theft > c) We have other buildings nearby "lit" via our own wireless or other > carriers' DS1 or ethernet circuits, and provide IP services. There's > no > Verizon in the picture either. > > d) We have customers out in Queens to whom we are doing point-point > wireless DS3 circuits. No Verizon. -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
