Hi, On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Angela Schreiber <anch...@adobe.com> wrote: > variant b: > only move the json and utility related code to oak-commons but create > a new dedicated module for the blob store related code. while this would > look more natural to me, i know that adding new module has been quite > controversial in the past.
I'd put the BlobStore interface and supporting code like AbstractBlobStore to a new o.a.j.oak.spi.blob package where it would be a more natural dependency to all the non-MK implementations. Doing so would require an oak-core dependency in oak-mk, but that should be fine if we can break the implementation dependency from oak-core to oak-mk. BR, Jukka Zitting