That has nothing to do with the change, but with the fact we don't have error reporting in OAuth.
EHL On 4/30/09 5:59 PM, "David Parry" <devb...@gmail.com> wrote: I don't have a problem with that, it makes perfect sense. But the proposed spec doesn't provide any method by which to deprecate the old broken 1.0 functionality and convey that to the consumer that is making the request. On May 1, 10:54 am, Jonathan Sergent <serg...@google.com> wrote: > Incrementing oauth_version is a mistake unless you want to ensure that no > compatibility occurs - if a server gets a request that is newer than what it > supports, it probably needs to reject the request. > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:43 PM, David Parry <devb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not incrementing the oauth_version for the new spec is a mistake imho. > > > It seems kinda flaky to me to switch between the specs 1.0/1.0a purely > > based on whether the oauth_callback is sent when a consumer obtains a > > request token. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
