Apologies for another newbie question: is the design-intention underlying the Assertion Flow in OAuth2.0-draft-05 the same as that in the WRAP draft (draft-hardt-oauth-01)?
/thomas/ __________________________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Dick Hardt > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:59 PM > To: Luke Shepard > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping > > because we use it > > On 2010-06-04, at 6:40 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: > > > Why? > > > > On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Patrick Harding wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Brian Campbell > >> <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre > >>> <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At the > >>>> interim > >>>> meeting we had some discussion about perhaps pulling the assertion > >>>> flow > >>>> out of the base spec and into a separate document. Perhaps that's the > >>>> best way to proceed. > >>> > >>> > >>> I'd like to see the assertion flow remain in the base spec. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OAuth mailing list > >>> OAuth@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OAuth mailing list > >> OAuth@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
