I hope so. On 2010-06-06, at 3:22 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
> Apologies for another newbie question: is the design-intention underlying the > Assertion Flow in OAuth2.0-draft-05 the same as that in the WRAP draft > (draft-hardt-oauth-01)? > > /thomas/ > > __________________________________________ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Dick Hardt >> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:59 PM >> To: Luke Shepard >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping >> >> because we use it >> >> On 2010-06-04, at 6:40 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: >> >>> Why? >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Patrick Harding wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Brian Campbell >>>> <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre >>>>> <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At the >>>>>> interim >>>>>> meeting we had some discussion about perhaps pulling the assertion >>>>>> flow >>>>>> out of the base spec and into a separate document. Perhaps that's the >>>>>> best way to proceed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to see the assertion flow remain in the base spec. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OAuth mailing list >>>>> OAuth@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OAuth mailing list >>>> OAuth@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
