Sure, there are plenty of things, each with a few people showing interest. But I have yet to see any proposal with enough interest to justify a working group. 5 items, each with 5 people showing interest doesn't make it a 25 people working group. It makes it 5 individual submissions with negligible support.
Keeping this text in the charter implies that we already have consensus for re-chartering. We don't. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 4:17 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; Blaine Cook; oauth@ietf.org; oauth- > a...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter > > > On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > >> Nov 2011 Prepare re-chartering > > > > I would like this removed. > > > > I would like to see this WG closed when this list is complete and if there > > is > further work with enough interest, a new working group can be created. > > Hi Eran, > > we already today see interest in doing additional work beyond what is on the > charter. We could remove the explicit item from the charter but we will > definitely call for rechartering after we are done with the currently > chartered > items. > > Ciao > Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
