This reply was just uncalled for. I resent the suggestions that my motives here are based on 'moving on to new topics', implying that if I don't want to continue working on OAuth, no one should.
My views are based solely on what I believe is in the best interest of this protocol and the concern that what is now a simple and useful protocol will turn into a goo of premature, designed-by-committee, anti-web extensions. Most of what I've seen suggested so far falls right into this category. Excuse me if the personal investment I have made in this work (far exceeding anyone else's) makes me protective of it. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:47 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; Phil Hunt; oauth WG; oauth-...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter > > > On May 9, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > I want to see this working group reach its end when this charter is > > fulfilled. > At that point, a new working group can be requested to work on other items. > The new working group can continue using this list which I assume will remain > open. > > > Eran, it is typically that people find their own work most useful and > relevant. > That's great. However, just because you do not want to do further work (for > example because you have moved on to new topics) does not mean that > everyone else shouldn't do anything else either. Please keep in mind that > other folks have higher expectations regarding OAuth interoperability > beyond just having the core specification. > > Ciao > Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
