+1 from me as well on submitting this as a WG doc. And thanks, Mike, for clarifying the dates.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > +1 on submitting this as a WG doc by the deadline on July 4th. > > As background, http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2011.html: > . 2011-07-04 (Monday): Internet Draft Cut-off for initial document > (-00) submission by 17:00 PT (00:00 UTC), upload using IETF ID Submission > Tool. > . 2011-07-11 (Monday): Internet Draft final submission cut-off by 17:00 > PT (00:00 UTC), upload using IETF ID Submission Tool > > So because the assertions draft will be a -00 draft, it must be submitted by > the 4th. A new version of the SAML doc could still be submitted until the > 11th, since it's not a -00 doc. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Brian Campbell > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:11 PM > To: Barry Leiba > Cc: OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: >> >> This document is intended to replace the SAML and Bearer Token >> documents, and those two will then be "profiles", defining specific >> assertion mechanisms. > > Just a couple points of clarification > > This doc is not related to the Bearer Token document > (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-04) - that is about access tokens and this series > of docs is about assertions for grants (and now client authentication). > > This doc doesn't replace anything so much as it pulls common elements out of > the SAML assertion (draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer) and JWT assertion > (draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer) documents. Those docs (and possibly others) > then become profiles of this doc and get to reuse the common pieces it > provides. > > This doc also reintroduces the abstract concept of client assertions for > client authentication using http parameters (client_assertion_type and > client_assertion). Presumably the SAML and JWT assertion docs will also be > reworked to account for that. > >> We would like to have them submit the restructured doc as a >> working-group document before the 4 July deadline, so we'd like to get >> any objections to this approach heard by >> 3 July. > > Barry, which docs to you need submitted by the 4th? Just > draft-ietf-oauth-assertions? Or draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer and > draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer as well? > >> I'm sorry for the very short notice, and you can blame that solely on >> the chairs. Chuck posted the draft about two weeks ago. >> >> See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mortimore-oauth-assertions >> >> The editors can answer any questions you have about how the document >> restructuring is being done. We will approve >> draft-ietf-oauth-assertions for submission as a working-group draft, >> pending consideration of objections. Again, please have a quick look >> (it's short), and post objections by 3 July. Thanks. >> >> Barry, as chair >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
