I think it will be true that the whole working group won't be focusing on all documents at the same time, much in the same way that different subsets of our current WG have focused on things like the security document or SAML bindings. In this fashion, I believe we'll be able to pull expertise from different sectors to produce a family of documents that live in an ecosystem around OAuth.
For many of these documents, even though they're not directly OAuth pieces (like JWT), but where else should they live? This may not be The Way That IETF Does It (I'm honestly not sure), but in my opinion, as long as each document has a dedicated editor and at least some interaction/support with the group we can handle many of these smaller items. -- Justin ________________________________________ From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [oauth-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Barry Leiba [barryle...@computer.org] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:05 PM To: OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering > do we have the band width to work on all these items, as some are > big and some are fairly small and contained. May have to have some > prioritized list of where people think these fit. Yes, exactly. And one of the things we'd like to hear from all of you is what your priorities are... how you would prioritize the list. Barry, chair-like object _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
