Who is "we had already decided"? This was not discussed on this list.
EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:19 AM > To: Richer, Justin P. > Cc: OAuth WG; Barry Leiba > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering > > Certainly not everyone needs to pay attention to everything. We are, > however, trying to determine whether there is a critical mass of interested > persons for a given item in terms of reviews, document authors, > implementers, and deployers. > > I do not see a problem at all with working on JWT within the OAuth working > group. I thought that we had already decided in the past that the JSON > signature & encryption work would go into JOES (earlier WOES) and the > home for JWT is the OAuth working group. The area directors may have a > different opinion but for the moment this is my working assumption. > > Ciao > Hannes > > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Richer, Justin P. wrote: > > > I think it will be true that the whole working group won't be focusing on > > all > documents at the same time, much in the same way that different subsets of > our current WG have focused on things like the security document or SAML > bindings. In this fashion, I believe we'll be able to pull expertise from > different sectors to produce a family of documents that live in an ecosystem > around OAuth. > > > > For many of these documents, even though they're not directly OAuth > pieces (like JWT), but where else should they live? This may not be The Way > That IETF Does It (I'm honestly not sure), but in my opinion, as long as each > document has a dedicated editor and at least some interaction/support with > the group we can handle many of these smaller items. > > > > -- Justin > > ________________________________________ > > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [oauth-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of > > Barry Leiba [barryle...@computer.org] > > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:05 PM > > To: OAuth WG > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering > > > >> do we have the band width to work on all these items, as some are big > >> and some are fairly small and contained. May have to have some > >> prioritized list of where people think these fit. > > > > Yes, exactly. And one of the things we'd like to hear from all of you > > is what your priorities are... how you would prioritize the list. > > > > Barry, chair-like object > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
