Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases. I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating. I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil. John B. On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: > How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our > use cases and requirements > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Mike Jones > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM > To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested > > I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents. > > I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 > minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, > given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs. > > I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would > appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for > that as well. (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review > the recent changes before saying that it's not.) > > Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver! > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested > > Hi all, > > I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. > > While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear > * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and > * whether you want to present something. > > I could imagine that these documents will be discussed: > * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg > * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token > * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer > * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation > * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases > > To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues > and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the > face-to-face meeting. > > I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time > at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore: > * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions > * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer > * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns > * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 > * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer > > Ciao > Hannes > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
