Sounds like a great idea. I can put together a few slides. Phil
On 2012-07-15, at 7:59, John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com> wrote: > Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases. > > I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap. > > Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was > mitigating. > > I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil. > > John B. > > On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: > >> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our >> use cases and requirements >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Mike Jones >> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM >> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested >> >> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents. >> >> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 >> minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, >> given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs. >> >> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would >> appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for >> that as well. (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review >> the recent changes before saying that it's not.) >> >> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver! >> >> -- Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Hannes Tschofenig >> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM >> To: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. >> >> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear >> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and >> * whether you want to present something. >> >> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed: >> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg >> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token >> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer >> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation >> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases >> >> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues >> and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the >> face-to-face meeting. >> >> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time >> at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore: >> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
