Good working with you and Tony is the stuff of dreams:) We can sync up off list and try to reduce duplication.
Are we all at CIS this week? John B. On 2012-07-15, at 11:47 AM, Phil Hunt wrote: > Sounds like a great idea. I can put together a few slides. > > Phil > > On 2012-07-15, at 7:59, John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com> wrote: > >> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases. >> >> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap. >> >> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was >> mitigating. >> >> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil. >> >> John B. >> >> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: >> >>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our >>> use cases and requirements >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>> Mike Jones >>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM >>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting >>> requested >>> >>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents. >>> >>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 >>> minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, >>> given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs. >>> >>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would >>> appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for >>> that as well. (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review >>> the recent changes before saying that it's not.) >>> >>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver! >>> >>> -- Mike >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>> Hannes Tschofenig >>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM >>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. >>> >>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to >>> hear >>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and >>> * whether you want to present something. >>> >>> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed: >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases >>> >>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues >>> and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before >>> the face-to-face meeting. >>> >>> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time >>> at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore: >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
