Hello Alex,

As I stated in an earlier email, I have been oblivious to any issues. I tend to 
focus more on international efforts.

This may be because there is no issue, or because discussions have been held in 
private. 

However, when people I respect for their past efforts resign mid-term and we 
have a list discussion on whether it is really necessary to have an open board 
list, it gets me wondering if there are deeper issues at play.

This may well be a storm in a tea cup, but I believe that it is worth working 
through.


@All,

As to what I want from our local community:

Openness within an open source community is critical to good community 
governance. 

There may be situations e.g. that involve code of conduct discussions; or 
procurement evaluations where private discussions are required, however these 
should be minimised, and not the norm. As a rule, all discussions should be 
open.


If people have not done so already, I suggest that Karl Fogel’s excellent book 
‘Producing Open Source software’ is a good starting point to help determine 
what they want.

This book can be found here:  https://producingoss.com/ 
<https://producingoss.com/>


I have found this book to be an excellent primer on what types of things need 
to be in place for a thriving and effective open source community.


Kind regards,

Bruce 



> On 7 Dec 2020, at 14:09, Alex Leith <alexgle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bruce
> 
> There have been three directors resign. Two for personal reasons, and one for 
> ethical reasons. (Correct me if I'm wrong, Daniel, John or Adam?)
> 
> I do feel fairly defensive of these types of criticisms, and I don't really, 
> honestly think I should, but I do. I have been involved in this organisation 
> from when it was an informal committee organising a conference through until 
> now, and like Ed and Phil say, it's full of good people doing good things and 
> meaning well. The organisation has made some minor mistakes, and we're still 
> working out how we work, but there is no serious issue that I see. Please 
> have a read of my words in the annual report, or help me understand what you 
> see as the serious issue or issues are?
> 
> I'd like to hear from the community about what the expectations of openness 
> are, though. And thankyou Ed for kicking this off.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:36, Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello Edoardo,
> 
> Well done for initiating this thread. I encourage the OSGeo Oceania community 
> to contribute their thoughts on this issue.
> 
> 
> I also encourage you to not try and downplay or whitewash any issues.
> 
> There is obviously a serious issue here. Why else did two former Directors 
> feel ethically compelled to resign from the OSGeo Oceania Board mid-term?
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
>> On 7 Dec 2020, at 11:17, Edoardo Neerhut <eneer...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:eneer...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for your thoughtful response Phil. I share much of your positivity 
>> and appreciation for all the board has achieved.
>> 
>> I agree that managing the myriad of communication channels is difficult and 
>> time consuming. I have a love/hate relationship with the mailing lists, but 
>> they seem to be the most open, universal mechanism to disseminate 
>> information and have discussions. Prediction: The year is 3020 and we're 
>> still sending emails to mailing lists.
>> 
>> My own conclusion with communication is that people should communicate 
>> wherever they like, but you have one central, open place for 
>> official/important communication and that would be the mailing list. Part of 
>> the conversation here seems to be: what is official and important? Did we 
>> make things as open as we should have?
>> 
>> These things are hard in a volunteer community, so this is not a criticism 
>> of anyone, but a reflection on the ways we can continually improve.
>> 
>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 10:18, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com 
>> <mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Folks
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> TLDR:
>> 
>> COVID-19! I am happy. The board are doing their difficult job in these 
>> initial stages. Communication in this day and age is bloody hard! Things 
>> will settle down.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> My experience
>> 
>> I have been a low key bystander during the formation of OSGEO Oceania. I am 
>> retired and have lots of time on my hands to check multiple communication 
>> channels. I am an initial member having attended the Melbourne conference 
>> and supported the idea of an organisation that supports our region in Open 
>> Source software and OpenStreetMap.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The role of the board is set out in a fairly legal and technical way and I 
>> commend all those that have stood up to take on the roles, especially in the 
>> formation stages of the organisation.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/resources/director-tools/practical-tools-for-directors/governance-relations/role-of-the-board
>>  
>> <https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/resources/director-tools/practical-tools-for-directors/governance-relations/role-of-the-board>
>>  
>> 
>> It’s not easy, there will be a learning a curve for many and there will be 
>> frustrations, arguments and concerns as the organisation develops. The 
>> overarching thing for me is that the board does not do anything that would 
>> be harmful to the community. To date, I have not seen anything that I 
>> believe has harmed the community. In the year of COVID I am just thankful 
>> that you have all survived in your work lives (hopefully!) as well as 
>> helping set up a vibrant regional organisation. Thank you.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There are likely processes that need to be ironed out, procedures that need 
>> formalising and standards set for appropriate timelines for actions but 
>> these things will get sorted as the pressure eases from the initial 
>> formation stage. Lets be honest, 2020 has been a year like no other and we 
>> have managed to survive! Thanks again to you all for your hard work.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Openness and communication
>> 
>> Do I, as a member, need to know every aspect of the board deliberations of 
>> all processes? No, I don’t, but I should have a role in helping formulate 
>> and at least seeing final drafts before a board sign-off. This has occurred 
>> with documents like the terms of reference. Would it be good to have the 
>> minutes of meetings in one place, yes absolutely. What’s the best place for 
>> those….well, I personally hate wiki’s but they seem to be the norm for open 
>> organisations. I can learn to live with that but I wish they had more 
>> structure and an easy way to navigate around!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I follow many communication channels for various reasons…Slack, Discord, 
>> Mailing lists, Email, Telegram, Zoom, Big Blue Button, Youtube streams….the 
>> list is endless these days and adoption varies widely across the Oceania 
>> region. This will be a challenge in the short and long term for the 
>> organisation. Regions may have their own preferences for local communication 
>> so subject to information being available to the wider region it may well be 
>> that regions collectively put their thoughts back to the board by one 
>> appropriate formal channel. Maybe the mailing list is the ‘formal’ channel?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Conclusion
>> 
>> Don’t be too hard on yourselves – you are all volunteers. Yes, we all need 
>> to get some structure back into our lives and OSGEO Oceania is no different. 
>> Work on getting timely and regular processes in place and solid regular 
>> communication to a formal channel (or two) but personally, I don’t need all 
>> the minute details – I trust the board to do no harm!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cheers – Phil (aka tastrax)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Oceania <oceania-boun...@lists.osgeo.org 
>> <mailto:oceania-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>> On Behalf Of Edoardo Neerhut
>> Sent: Sunday, 6 December 2020 10:32 PM
>> To: oceania@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:oceania@lists.osgeo.org>
>> Subject: [OSGeo Oceania] A discussion on openness
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> TLDR: 
>> 
>> To the current/former directors: How would you describe the organisation's 
>> experience with openness and transparency?
>> 
>> To the whole community: How do you feel? What should the board and the 
>> community do more or less of?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The context
>> 
>> There have been a number of comments made recently about transparency and 
>> openness and I wanted to tease them out a bit as the end of year approaches. 
>> In particular, Adam and John expressed their concerns here 
>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/oceania-board/2020-November/000112.html> 
>> and here 
>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/oceania/2020-November/002439.html> 
>> respectively, with both resigning as directors as a consequence.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> This is clearly an issue for further discussion. The OSGeo Oceania director 
>> elections end in a few hours and regardless of the results, I am very keen 
>> to hear what practical steps we should take to address these concerns. 
>> Adam/John: if you have time to elaborate that would be much appreciated as 
>> well.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> My experience
>> 
>> I think most would agree transparency and openness should be fundamental 
>> aspects to our community. What's harder is living up to them. I am guilty of 
>> sending a quick Slack message or email to people for the sake of expediency, 
>> but failing on transparency as a consequence.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I have worked with many on the current board and feel they are all 
>> wonderful, talented people, operating with the best interests of OSGeo 
>> Oceania at heart. I'm optimistic about where we're at and we can go and I 
>> want to thank all on the board and the wider community for getting us here. 
>> Hundreds of people from across the region have been able to learn, share, 
>> and connect with geospatial ideas and tools through these efforts. I 
>> honestly don't believe there is a people issue here, but a fog over the 
>> decision making process which we need to tease out.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> My read from where I stand is that there is a constant battle between 
>> expediency and openness. I am still trying to understand the relationship 
>> between these two things at a practical level.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Practically speaking, what should we do?
>> 
>> I am going to assume we agree that openness is fundamental to the health of 
>> the organisation. If I have falsely assumed this, please correct me.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On the areas we are failing, why do we think this is the case? I believe 
>> everyone is operating in good faith. 
>> 
>> Take the example of meeting minutes. They went up eventually, so do we need 
>> to make sure we share responsibility more so that this happens immediately 
>> after? Could members of the community join board meetings in this role?
>> On board decisions, why were some decisions timely? Can we minimise that in 
>> future? Were some board members slow to make a decision? What is the 
>> expectation here from board members?
>> The concept of membership is still vague and I bear more responsibility for 
>> this failure than anyone. At the same time, this is something that we as a 
>> community should decide collectively. I should have done more to initiatie 
>> that conversation openly.
>> These are just three examples. I'm sure there are many more.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> So finally, what are the low hanging fruits? Where should the community 
>> focus our efforts going forward? Why are we failing in these areas? How 
>> should we address them?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We've come a long way thanks to all of you and I'm very optimistic about the 
>> road ahead. How do we traverse it?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Ed
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oceania mailing list
>> Oceania@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Oceania@lists.osgeo.org>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania 
>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oceania mailing list
> Oceania@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Oceania@lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania 
> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alex Leith
> m: 0419189050

_______________________________________________
Oceania mailing list
Oceania@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania

Reply via email to