tir, 02 12 2008 kl. 22:54 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber: > Yes, but it's possible to compile Octave without sparse support. So > arpack is relying on a feature that might not be there. Or is > suitesparse now mandatory in Octave? Then my argument is obviously > void.
Isn't the relevant question if the binary distributed by Debian is compiled against suitesparse? I mean, if the binary version of Octave that ships with Debian (and hence Ubuntu) depends on suitesparse, then I would assume that the octave-headers package would depend on the suitesparse headers. So, while Octave can be compiled without suitesparse, I don't think that matters as the Debian binary is compiled with suitesparse. But hey, I might be misunderstanding the octave-headers package. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
