Hi Lasse, 2011/1/24 Lasse Kunnasluoto <lasse.kunnaslu...@tieto.com>: >> Let us set aside the the merits of the use cases for these features for >> the moment ;) Implementing Call control by USIM is fairly >> straightforward to do in the core. However, no modem manufacturer >> currently allows us to have full control over this feature. It is >> implemented in the firmware and every vendor does this differently. So >> for now support of this feature is in the realm of the modem driver. >> > okay, so assuming this is how it is going stay. Even modem handles > these, ofono should deliver possible AlphaId SIM may give in a response > to call control envelope. I did not see if this is implemented. Or is it > dropped since it is not tested in GCF..
I think enabling these types of modems would require the stk driver API be able to give a bit of context to a proactive command. For example, indicating that a send SMS proactive command is for information purposes only, and that the SMS has been sent by the modem. Also some sort of feature negotiation between core and the stk drivers might be needed for instance for indicating whether the modem takes care of call control or not. The ISI modems are another variation on this topic, as there you need to use a specific request type to create calls with SIM toolkit turned off (= no call control). With the default request type and implementation, the call service would actually send the call control requests back towards the stk driver. This would likely cause the voicecall driver to be different, say, between the isiusb and n900 plugins. Cheers, Aki _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
