On 2/25/2010 12:40 PM, Jim Walker wrote: > On 02/25/10 01:12 PM, Alan Burlison wrote: >> On 25/02/2010 19:48, Peter Tribble wrote: >> >> Just to be absolutely clear: the recording of CC grants and the >> active/inactive state of an individual account are unrelated. One is a >> community/constitutional issue, the other is a website account >> management issue. For example, if we detect an intrusion attempt on an >> account we inactivate the account until it's been checked. That clearly >> shouldn't result in someone losing their vote. >> >> During the recent grant cleanup I entered multiple CC grants for >> accounts that were at the time inactive, some of those are now active. >> If the OGB wants to define criteria for removing part of the electorate >> they they need to find something other than the transient >> active/inactive state of the accounts. > > Please keep track of CCs activated since the 20th. > > And stop telling people they are eligible to vote if their account > is active.
Who is this directed to? We can't *not* activate accounts, as previously discussed. I can send you a list of people that have activated their accounts since today, but we can't limit those accounts in any way in terms of how that interact with the applications. In addition, last year I helped people fix various account issues (missing SSH keys, logon problems) during the entire election process, so I'm not sure what you are asking here from an operational standpoint. We have no plans to send out additional reminders, however. Derek > > Cheers, > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss > -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
