On 2/25/2010 1:25 PM, John Plocher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Derek Cicero <Derek.Cicero at sun.com
> <mailto:Derek.Cicero at sun.com>> wrote:
>
>     Who is this directed to?
>
> The *whole point* of having a date of record is to have a mechanism by
> which the tools and processes can easily determine whether or not a
> particular person, with a particular set of circumstances, is allowed to
> vote in a given election.
>
> It sounds like the tools we have didn't implement a date of record
> mechanism, and so can't tell if someone is actually allowed to vote.   Sigh.

There is date of record for CC grants and on that date 428 people had CC 
grants and were *eligible* to vote.

Whether or not an account was active on that date, or any other date, is 
irrelevant to the Constitution. *Your* account could be inactivated 
tommorow if you failed X number of login attempts. At that point, you 
would email me and I would manually reactivate the account. It's 
entirely possible that several of the current active accounts with CC 
grants will lock themselves out of their accounts in the next few weeks. 
That is an operational problem completely separate from their the CC grants.

Derek
>
>    -John
>
>


-- 
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division

Reply via email to