Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Ben Rockwood wrote: >> Item 4: Main Motion (benr03), language follows: 'In the best interest of >> full disclosure and transparency with the community at large which we >> represent; I resolve that the ogb-private email list be opened to public >> view; existing archived messages created prior to the adoption of this >> resolution shall be exempt as the authors interacted without the >> expectation of public review. The archive shall, therefore, be >> destroyed and henceforth public.' > > If you're going to make it public, why not just destroy it? What's the > purpose of a public ogb-private list separate from ogb-discuss or the > previously discussed ogb-business?
Strongly disagree with this. From time to time the board *will* need to discuss sensitive matters in private with a 3rd party - whether that's about code matters, personal or otherwise. Glynn
