Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I will add that, while I still disagree, there is value in providing a
> private archived place for discussion which discourages private
> non-archived (direct email) discussion. The archive can be of use to
> future OGB board members for historical review.
Since there is no effective difference between today's OS.o Members
and tomorrow's "newly elected OGB member", what benefit is there to
keeping this info opaque? At some point in the future, everyone
[who gets elected] has a chance of seeing it...
Maybe the right answer is to expose the archives on a lagging 1-year
(or 1-OGB-term) basis or something like that - private while the topics
are fresh, public after it no longer matters.
$0.02,
-John
