On 02/11/2007, Keith M Wesolowski <keith.wesolowski at sun.com> wrote:
> The right thing to do is roll back the content to the state it was in
> for most of the past 2 years.  I had hoped that reaching consensus
> here about the underlying issue would make that clear, but for reasons

Claiming consensus when there is none is a bit disingenuous.

Please provide your interesting definition of consensus.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall

Reply via email to