Mike Kupfer has the following proposed clarifying amendment, with which I agree:
Replace: > Quite clearly these two activities have virtually no connection with > each other. I would therefore like to propose that the Website Project > be promoted to a Community. This proposal also subsumes the "Website > Editorial Committee" [3] which was proposed by John Plocher at the OGB > meeting on 14th November 2007. With: > While there are some shared areas of interest between the Tools and > Website communities (e.g. the web application for the SCM system), > it's not an extensive overlap. And as the web infrastructure evolves to > allow plug-in services, there will be even less inherent connection > between the Website work and the other Tools work. In contrast, > website content and infrastructure issues are inherently connected > (systemic changes to one will often result in changes to the other). > I would therefore like to propose that the Website Project be promoted > to a Community. This proposal also subsumes the "Website Editorial > Committee" [3] which was proposed by John Plocher at the OGB meeting > on 14th November 2007. -- Alan Burlison --
