The proposal below looks good to me, especially since it also answers  
Roy's very reasonable issues with the proposed OGB Committee. I  
suggest the Content project also be endorsed by Advocacy since there  
is a clear functional relationship.

S.


On Nov 27, 2007, at 21:34, Alan Burlison wrote:

> At present the opensolaris.org Website Project is a subproject of the
> Tools Community, and it has become clear that it is a poor fit.  The
> introductory paragraph on the Tools project [1] page says:
>
> ----------
> "The Tools community welcomes individuals interested in the
> implementation of infrastructure used to build and manage OpenSolaris.
> This infrastructure includes compilers, source managers and browsers,
> and OpenSolaris-specific development, build, and install tools  
> (like wx,
> cw, and bfu)."
> ----------
>
> In contrast, the introductory paragraph on the Website Project page  
> [2]
> says:
>
> ----------
> The website project covers both the development and operations of the
> opensolaris.org infrastructure.
> ----------
>
> Quite clearly these two activities have virtually no connection with
> each other.  I would therefore like to propose that the Website  
> Project
> be promoted to a Community.  This proposal also subsumes the "Website
> Editorial Committee" [3] which was proposed by John Plocher at the OGB
> meeting on 14th November 2007.
>
> My proposal would have several benefits:
>
> * Help make the website work become more visible, and hopefully  
> attract
>    more contributors.
>
> * Provide a single point of call for all issues related to
>   opensolaris.org.
>
> * Provide a natural home for all current and future website-related
>    work such as the new authentication and authorisation system, the
>    online voting system, selection of a CMS/Wiki, site look & feel and
>    so forth.
>
> I feel that the current "Website Editorial Committee" proposal is a  
> poor
> solution to the requirement for oversight of the content of the site
> home page.  The proposed Committee is a radical departure from the
> Community/Project structures used by the OpenSolaris community, and
> seems to provide little benefit over the existing mechanisms that we
> have in place.
>
> The details of my proposal are as follows:
>
> 1. Promote the Website Project to be a Community.
>
> 2. Ask the OpenGrok Project (currently under Tools) if they wish to
>     remain under Tools or move to the new Website Community.
>
> 3. The Project leaders of the Website Project become the initial  
> set of
>     Community leaders of the Website Community, namely:
>         * jimgris (Jim Grisanzio)
>         * alanbur (Alan Burlison)
>         * patrickf (Patrick Finch)
>         * barb1 (Barbara Lundquist)
>         * sch (Stephen Hahn)
>         * stevel (Stephen Lau)
>         * sarad (Sara Dornsife)
>
> 4. The following initial set of Projects to be set up by the Website
> Community:
>
>     * Content
>       Replacement for the proposed "Website Editorial Committee".
>       Manages shared site content, i.e. anything that is not owned  
> by a
>       particular Community or Project.  Also responsible for site L&F,
>       layout and markup standards.
>
>     * Infrastructure
>       Development of the site infrastructure, as outlined in the
>       "Restructuring the opensolaris.org infrastructure" document [4].
>       Will generate projects as necessary to implement particular
>       features, e.g. the Auth project (see below).
>
>     * Operations
>       Issues related to the running of the site. Initial membership  
> to be
>       the same as the current tonic-ops group.
>
>     * Auth
>       Project to provide a new distributed user management,
>       authentication and authorisation mechanism.
>
> 5. The existing website-discuss mailing list to remain as a
>     Community-level forum.  The existing website-content mailing list
>     will be used by the Content project, with mailing lists for other
>     Projects being set up as and when required.
>
> ----------
>
> [1] http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/
> [2] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/website/
> [3]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-November/ 
> 003449.html
> [4] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/website/website_restructuring/
>
> -- 
> Alan Burlison
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss


Reply via email to