Alan Burlison wrote: > Although there is an overlap between the existing Content Project and my > proposal, I'm not sure it is a complete overlap. It seems clear that > there is a requirement for a Project that focuses primarily on the > website. I'd therefore suggest that we rename my proposed 'Content' > project to 'Website Editorial', and that the initial Members be drawn > from the existing Website Project, the Advocacy CG and the > Documentation/Content Project. > > I'd see this group acting as a coordinator for content that was > primarily generated by other CGs and Projects - for example, when there > is a conference coming up the homepage content could be provided by the > Advocacy CG, when a particular CG had a major event such as a release, > it could provide the homepage content. And at other times we might > choose to have 'Article of the Week' on the homepage, with the content > (for example) being provided by the Documentation CG. Because the > content on the homepage will be coming from different sources over time, > I think it is important that the Project that schedules the changes to > the homepage is seen to be independent from the CGs and Projects that > provide the content.
Sounds good to me. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
