Alan Burlison wrote: > Simon Phipps wrote: > >> The proposal below looks good to me, especially since it also answers >> Roy's very reasonable issues with the proposed OGB Committee. I >> suggest the Content project also be endorsed by Advocacy since there >> is a clear functional relationship. > > Mike Kupfer wrote: > >> Would it work to have a Content project that is overseen by multiple >> Community Groups? > > Which seems eminently sensible to me. Perhaps the initial Project > membership should be drawn from members of bot the existing Website > Project and the Advocacy Community Group?
Good proposal. I think it goes a long way to solving the problem. Happy to participate. However, I`m not sure Advocacy has any special role or skill set here over any other CG that may have people with editorial experience or people who simply have an interest in participating. As always, it will be immediately obvious who does the work and who doesn`t. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
