Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 02/05/07, Josh Berkus <Josh.Berkus at sun.com> wrote:
>> Sean,
>>
>> > I think that we should avoid *at all costs* osol-jobs or the like. This
>> > kind of forum is spam-prone in the absolute extreme; and it will be
>> > ultimately dragged down into the mire of complete
>> > disinterest/abandonment by abuse of its genuine raison d'etre.
>>
>> We've been running pgsql-jobs at postgresql.org for years without issues; we
>> even set up an arrangement with opensourceexperts.com to cross-post to 
>> it.
>> Never a complaint, and it's been very useful to PostgreSQL consultants.
>>
>> The one trick is that the list is 100% moderated.  So if we wanted an
>> osol-jobs, someone would need to volunteer a couple hours of their time
>> per week as moderator.
> 
> This sounds like the most sane approach so far.



I agree. I've screened and rejected dozens of attempts to let recruiters 
on our lists and I know others have done the same. However, offering a 
single moderated list for this function would be a good way to let 
people choose to see the postings. And for those interested, it's 
obviously a very good thing.

Jim






Reply via email to