Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:19:37AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > >> I thought I would chime in to agree with Ben's proposal. A home for >> immigrants is a great idea still, but a Community Group isn't the >> right structure to hold it. A Project under Advocacy would be great. > > Given the latest thinking that Jim and I expressed[0], what would be > this project's goal? Or, more directly, how would the team know when > it's done? If it's an ongoing effort, perhaps it should be > represented as an Advocacy committee instead. > > [0] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000447.html > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000508.html
I don't like the idea of an Advocacy committee - I would imagine committees are relatively small in size, and focused on a particular issue. Advocacy seems to large to fit that. I don't feel like there are any downsides in the proposal - if there are, I don't think there would be massive upheaval required to change it as our community process evolves. Glynn
