* Glynn Foster <Glynn.Foster at sun.com> [2007-05-21 21:29]: > > > Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:19:37AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > >> I thought I would chime in to agree with Ben's proposal. A home for > >> immigrants is a great idea still, but a Community Group isn't the > >> right structure to hold it. A Project under Advocacy would be great. > > > > Given the latest thinking that Jim and I expressed[0], what would be > > this project's goal? Or, more directly, how would the team know when > > it's done? If it's an ongoing effort, perhaps it should be > > represented as an Advocacy committee instead. > > > > [0] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000447.html > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000508.html > > I don't like the idea of an Advocacy committee - I would imagine committees > are > relatively small in size, and focused on a particular issue. Advocacy seems to > large to fit that. > > I don't feel like there are any downsides in the proposal - if there are, I > don't think there would be massive upheaval required to change it as our > community process evolves.
(Keith's point, I think, is that the current Immigrants CG is not suitable as a Project, under the terms he and Jim were working towards. Advocacy is still a CG.) -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
