Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:19:37AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > >> I thought I would chime in to agree with Ben's proposal. A home for >> immigrants is a great idea still, but a Community Group isn't the >> right structure to hold it. A Project under Advocacy would be great. >> > > Given the latest thinking that Jim and I expressed[0], what would be > this project's goal? Or, more directly, how would the team know when > it's done? If it's an ongoing effort, perhaps it should be > represented as an Advocacy committee instead. > > [0] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000447.html > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-May/000508.html > >
Committee's are bodies of bureaucrats that follow through on some action because the parent body is unable or unwilling. I have envisioned, and discussed with Stephen Hahn over a year ago, a division between technical and non-technical community sub-groups to which I call projects (technical) and initiatives (non-technical). I would ask that the OGB consider using these terms instead. benr.
