I know I don't get a vote here, but this looks like gerrymandering
at its worst. I believe the majority and the quorum have to be based
on the number of members in the electorate. So you have two choices:
Electorate: 428 Majority: 215 Quorum: 143
or
Electorate: 377 Majority: 189 Quoram: 126
Saying that there are 428 members of the electorate, but only 189
votes are needed to revise the constitution just doesn't pass the
smell test.
- Don
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:09 PM, John Plocher wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Jim Walker <James.Walker at sun.com> wrote:
>> So what are the Record Date numbers?
>
> The record date numbers *WERE* (can't change them retroactively)
> Auth'd voters on the DOR: 377
> Majority based on the number of Auth'd voters on the DOR: 189
> Quorum based on the number of Auth'd voters on the DOR: 126
>
> The only thing we are doing here is to explicitly extend
> enfranchisement to the 51 CCs who hadn't auth'd on the DOR. This
> gives us:
>
> Electorate: 428 Majority: 189 Quorum: 126
>
> -John
