Corey Reid wrote: > > one of the things I like about this license is the clear language it's > written in. It also makes a distinction between the legal license to use the > logos and conditions under which they may be used. Very interesting. > > It also opens up the possibility of expanding d20 into myriad "genres" -- I > can see "d20 Sourcebooks", "d20 Conversions", "d20 Supplements"... > I would like to see this, as well. What is needed is relatively objective definitions of "Supplement", "Sourcebook", "Conversion", etc.
- [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing model for D2... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licen... Tim Dugger
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licen... Weldon Dodd
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... Brad Thompson
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... Tim Dugger
- [ogf-d20-l] Bad Rumor or an End to Ryan's Dream? Eric Rowe
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Bad Rumor or an End to Ryan's D... R. Hyrum Savage
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... Corey Reid
- RE: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... Corey Reid
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Fascinating potential licensing mod... Clark Peterson
