Aeon wrote:

> This may seem an obvious question, but doesn't having more than one FAQ totally 
>defeat the purpose of having a FAQ in the first place? After all, the point is to 
>direct people to a single source for all their questions. It only weakens everyone's 
>case to split efforts like this. If there are two FAQ's, why not three? If three, why 
>not ten? If ten, all different, why have a FAQ at all?

There is Faust's "real story" FAQ, which takes a pessimisitc viewpoint, 
and my "Party line" FAQ that takes a more optimistic viewpoint so as to 
counter Faust's negativity.

Actually, we're both just trying to get some free publicity by helping 
the community until Ryan gets around to making a "real" FAQ.


DM

Reply via email to