Ryan,

So, to clarify, please confirm or educate me as to
WotC's position on each of these scenarios.

1.  Publisher uses d20 SRD and publishes d20
compatible adventure module under the d20 license
>with< the d20 Trademark logo (when released).  This
meets WotC's legal tests?  

2.  Publisher uses d20 SRD and publishes d20
compatible adventure module under the d20 license
before the d20 TM is released.  This meets WotC's
legal tests?

3.  Publisher uses d20 SRD and publishes d20
compatible adventure module >not under< the d20
license.  This meets WotC's tests?

Thank you,

Mac Golden

--- "Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Troll Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > Previously, however, you indicated that
> publications
> > based on the d20SRD without the d20 logo were
> > perfectly fine.  Would you please clarify?
> 
> Again:  There is >nothing< in the D20 System
> Reference Document which
> requires the use of the D20 System Trademark.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> -------------
> For more information, please link to
www.opengamingfoundation.org


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to