> Kal Lin > > Or someone could just go publish a work they want to make > based on content they believe is open and disregard any > complaints from the person who tried to close some open > content. Um, Kal, I understand your logic here, but this is a very dangerous move. Copyrights are automatic until ruled otherwise by the courts. If the original publisher of the OGL never comes forward to dispute the copyright on the person who closed that material, you'll be left twisting in the wind. You don't have the authority to dispute it for him. -Brad ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellec... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual Pro... Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual Pro... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual Pro... kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual... Infinite Possibilities
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OGL and Intellectual... Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Lette... Ron Bedison
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Lette... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Letter Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the Lette... R. Hyrum Savage
- RE: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the L... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] The Spirit and the L... Infinite Possibilities
