In a message dated 08/18/2000 11:49:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > First, I haven't had any problem with the language that wasn't clarified by > the > discussions held here -- that's the reason for the list, I think. > > Second, there's certainly nothing preventing a group of like mindedgamers > from > coming up with their own OGL -- and paying for their own legal council to > examine. > > Third, the slight Wizard bias doesn't bother me as it is their game they're > using > for their version of the OGL. Hum. Then that is where I am confused. I knew the OGL was "invented" by Ryan Dancy, but I thought the project was directed towards RPGs, not just D&D. I'm not saying that is a good or bad thing, but it changes my perspective, obviously. So, who is the OGL for? Regards, Maggie ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL MaggieVining
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Richard Pace
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Will Hindmarch
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Will Hindmarch
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Will Hindmarch
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OG... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OG... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL MaggieVining
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Chris DeLisle
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Thoughts on OGL Chris DeLisle
