> hmmm... on first glance, looks ok. The WotC OGL forbids using > trademarks without permission (even in ways that woul normally be > legal without obtaining prior permission). But those aren't > trademarks. [frex, just did a trademark search on "beholder"--closest > i find is a dead trademark for "The Beholder", a web-comic, formerly > owned by Nabisco. ] You're referencing a core rulebook in an > acceptable manner. You're not reproducing copyrighted text (single > words/titles can't be copyrighted). You're being careful not to > contribute material to OGC that you don't have authority to > contribute. I don't think you're afoul of the D20STL, in any flavor, > because (1) neither of those are defined terms and (2) you're using > them without changing their definitions, even if they were defined > terms. Looks ok to me--doesn't even look like you need to get > permission, just to do that. Opinions? Any with a law background > care to weigh in?
You are under a licence. Get permission for stuff not in it. Andrew McDougall a.k.a. Tir Gwaith _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
