Faustus von Goethe wrote:
Moreover, the questions I think you are asking Matthew are also a little off-base, as I think you are citing one small part of his (former) reasoning - the "you can rewrite any of this" line of thinking that he was advancing. I do not think that was his central point, and I do not think he is still supporting it.Though I think Mongoose shouldn't be used as an example or the discussion of very many threads for the next few weeks, I would like to point out that Matthew said that only his one product was 100% OGC, not the entire Mongoose product line. There are still several products whose major re-use potential essentially requires permission.
Certainly, "TEXT" is what is copyrightable, ideas aren't.And conversely, "TEXT" is what you need to mark as Open Gaming Content, not the ideas the text conveys.
Hey, wait, isn't basic spelled B-A-S-I-C? Why use the "spelled-in-correctly" abbreviation? (If you meant "called basic but not basic", then wouldn't quotation marks be better?)To fully understand the OGL you need to grasp this basic (sic) premise.
DM
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
