In a message dated 2/20/03 7:04:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


<<>Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought the Sigil was addressing a different product
I thought he was speaking mostly in generalities.

>>

I thought he asked specifically about the Quintessential Dwarf, right?  Or are you saying his questions were pretty broad in spite of this?

BTW -- I concur with your position that it's probably a good thing to wait and see...

<<Yeah, but he also said that he was gonna go back and reevaluate his
declaration for future products.� I'm inclined to wait until i hear more
before judging ...>>

Right.  I actually noted (I thought) in one of my last few posts that it was probably more useful to just spend the time to recraft his OGC declarations than to answer a bunch of questions.  By answering questions to quickly he might paint himself into a corner inadvertently.  It probably makes more sense for him to just flip through each of his products that use the boilerplate declaration and see how he needs to re-issue his OGC declarations.

Honestly, except for people who have reason to make an actual legal claim against Mongoose, that should be sufficient for the rest of the world, particularly if people keep their blood pressure low and play nice.

That's certainly all I need to decide which, if any, Mongoose products I'd consider adding to my collection.

Lee

Reply via email to