On Feb 19, 2008 6:56 AM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't make any predictions as to how much I will > > (or won't) be drawn > > in to a new from-ground-up project, but I can agree > > that you are not at > > all insane for suggesting it. > > Same here! The FMF is a clean-room implementation, so > it isn't restricted like the standard OHR is. (E.g., > 32-bit color is fine for anything if I want it to be.) > You could re-write the standard OHR in Haskell and it > wouldn't affect FMF development. > > That said, one of the reasons I DON'T want to get > involved coding the standard OHR is that it's such a > godawful mess. Were you to attempt to "do it right", I > would be willing to chip in. Of course, this depends > on the language used. I really, _really_ can't do > pointer arithmetic.
Actually, you'd be surprised. ptrDangerous++ is pretty easy to write ;) > What do the rest of you think? > -->Seth Anyway, I would like to emphasize that this project would not be the OHR+ or anything, it would be... well, what HamsterWheel was touted to be years ago. Something much bigger and better. -- Mike Caron Tale of the Cave http://taleofthecave.com _______________________________________________ Ohrrpgce mailing list ohrrpgce@lists.motherhamster.org http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
