On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbaile...@aol.com> wrote: > I think I would add the series number. There doesn't seem to be much point > in identifying a book as being in a series if there is no indication of > which one in the series it is.
Yes, certainly, we want the number identifying which one in the series it is. To expand or clarify, then, I guess my specific question is whether that should go in the series name field, or in another field such as the subtitle. I know data gets conflated when translated between different databases, but I don't know what is considered the standard or proper way of describing the series collective and individual data (if there is such a thing). Thanks for the feedback. - Alan _______________________________________________ Ol-discuss mailing list Ol-discuss@archive.org http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to ol-discuss-unsubscr...@archive.org
